↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Quality of life and coping strategies of outpatients with a depressive disorder in maintenance therapy – a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Quality of life and coping strategies of outpatients with a depressive disorder in maintenance therapy – a cross-sectional study
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s153115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michaela Holubova, Jan Prasko, Marie Ociskova, Ales Grambal, Milos Slepecky, Marketa Marackova, Dana Kamaradova, Marta Zatkova

Abstract

The quality of life (QoL) is a multidimensional view that represents all aspects of patient well-being in various areas of patient life. Specific coping strategies may be connected to both the QoL and the severity of mental disorder. The aim of this investigation was to examine the relationship between the QoL and the coping strategies of outpatients with a depressive disorder. Eighty-two outpatients, who met the criteria of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, for a depressive disorder, were enrolled in the cross-sectional study. Data on sociodemographic and clinical variables were obtained from the medical records. Individuals filled the following standardized questionnaires: Quality of Life Satisfaction and Enjoyment Questionnaire, Stress Coping Style Questionnaire, and Clinical Global Impression. Multiple regression analyses with backward elimination were performed to discover the most influential factors contributing to QoL. The participants with a depressive disorder showed an overuse of negative coping strategies, especially escape tendency and resignation. A positive self-instruction strategy was used by the patients less often. The coping strategies were significantly associated with the QoL. A more frequent use of positive coping strategies had a positive association with the QoL. The main factors related to QoL were the subjective severity of the disorder, employment, and positive coping strategies. The study confirmed the relationship between QoL and the coping strategies of outpatients with a depressive disorder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Professor 3 4%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,583
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,359
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#55
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.