↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s61617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommaso Iannitti, Alessandro Di Cerbo, Julio Cesar Morales-Medina, Beniamino Palmieri

Abstract

The use of telemedicine has grown across several medical fields, due to the increasing number of "e-patients".

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Psychology 10 6%
Computer Science 9 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 40 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,490,556
of 14,634,562 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#370
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,167
of 281,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,634,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.