| Title |
Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s61617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Di Cerbo, Julio Cesar Morales-Medina, Beniamino Palmieri, Tommaso Iannitti |
| Abstract |
The use of telemedicine has grown across several medical fields, due to the increasing number of "e-patients". |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Argentina | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#639
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,289
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.