↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Inhaled therapies in patients with moderate COPD in clinical practice: current thinking

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled therapies in patients with moderate COPD in clinical practice: current thinking
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s145573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amnon Ariel, Alan Altraja, Andrey Belevskiy, Piotr W Boros, Edvardas Danila, Matjaz Fležar, Vladimir Koblizek, Zvi G Fridlender, Kosta Kostov, Alvils Krams, Branislava Milenkovic, Attila Somfay, Ruzena Tkacova, Neven Tudoric, Ruxandra Ulmeanu, Arschang Valipour

Abstract

COPD is a complex, heterogeneous condition. Even in the early clinical stages, COPD carries a significant burden, with breathlessness frequently leading to a reduction in exercise capacity and changes that correlate with long-term patient outcomes and mortality. Implementation of an effective management strategy is required to reduce symptoms, preserve lung function, quality of life, and exercise capacity, and prevent exacerbations. However, current clinical practice frequently differs from published guidelines on the management of COPD. This review focuses on the current scientific evidence and expert opinion on the management of moderate COPD: the symptoms arising from moderate airflow obstruction and the burden these symptoms impose, how physical activity can improve disease outcomes, the benefits of dual bronchodilation in COPD, and the limited evidence for the benefits of inhaled corticosteroids in this disease. We emphasize the importance of maximizing bronchodilation in COPD with inhaled dual-bronchodilator treatment, enhancing patient-related outcomes, and enabling the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD in well-defined patient groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,379,886
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#400
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,788
of 446,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#13
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.