↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Assessment of pain score and specimen adequacy for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of pain score and specimen adequacy for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s148088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Jen Liao, Wu-Chia Lo, Wan-Lun Hsu, Po-Wen Cheng, Cheng-Ping Wang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate pain scores and specimen adequacy for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) of thyroid nodules without and with local anesthesia (LA). The US-FNAB procedure was performed on 183 patients with and without LA. One puncture was made for solid nodules, and if patients could tolerate it, a two-puncture technique was used for nodules with a cystic change. Four-point verbal rating scores were assessed by a nursing assistant after completion of US-FNAB. To be an adequate specimen, at least six groups of follicular cells are required, and each group should contain at least 10 cells. Immediately after US-FNAB, 92% of patients with LA and 80% without LA reported no or mild pain (p=0.01). Most patients tolerated the procedure well, with no pain (82.5%) reported 5 minutes after the procedure. In univariate logistic regression, irregular boundary (odds ratio [OR]: 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-6.06, p=0.04), calcification (OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.06-7.76, p=0.04), and LA (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.86, p=0.02) were significantly associated with immediate moderate or severe pain. Specimen adequacy was significantly associated with age (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p<0.01), heterogeneous echo-texture (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.23-5.17, p=0.01), predominate solid architecture (OR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.42-5.41, p<0.01), and the use of LA (OR: 3.34, 95% CI: 1.70-6.56, p<0.01). In multivariate logistic regression, patients receiving LA had lower risk of moderate or severe pain (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.67, p=0.01) and higher chances of specimen adequacy (OR: 4.84, 95% CI: 2.17-10.7, p<0.01) compared to patients who did not receive LA. US-FNAB is a safe procedure, and most patients report no pain 5 minutes after the procedure. The use of LA was associated with lower immediate pain scales and higher specimen adequacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,715,924
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#503
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,830
of 437,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#18
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.