↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Identification of highly conserved regions in L-segment of Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever virus and immunoinformatic prediction about potential novel vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Identification of highly conserved regions in L-segment of Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever virus and immunoinformatic prediction about potential novel vaccine
Published in
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/aabc.s75250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arafat Rahman Oany, Shah Adil Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Mohammad Uzzal Hossain, Tahmina Pervin Jyoti

Abstract

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne zoonotic viral disease with a disease fatality rate between 15% and 70%. Despite the wide range of distribution, the virus (CCHFV) is basically endemic in Africa, Asia, eastern Europe, and the Middle East. Acute febrile illness associated with petechiae, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and multiple-organ failure are the main symptoms of the disease. With all these fatal effects, CCHFV is considered a huge threat as no successful therapeutic approach is currently available for the treatment of this disease. In the present study, we have used the immunoinformatics approach to design a potential epitope-based vaccine against the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-L of CCHFV. Both the T-cell and B-cell epitopes were assessed, and the epitope "DCSSTPPDR" was found to be the most potential one, with 100% conservancy among all the strains of CCHFV. The epitope was also found to interact with both type I and II major histocompatibility complex molecules and is considered nonallergenic as well. In vivo study of our proposed peptide is advised for novel universal vaccine production, which might be an effective path to prevent CCHF disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#11
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,062
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them