↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Types and delivery of emotional support to promote linkage and engagement in HIV care

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Types and delivery of emotional support to promote linkage and engagement in HIV care
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s145698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christa L Cook, Shantrel Canidate, Nicole Ennis, Robert L Cook

Abstract

Despite recommendations for early entry into human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care, many people diagnosed with HIV delay seeking care. Multiple types of social support (ie, cognitive, emotional, and tangible) are often needed for someone to transition into HIV care, but a lack of emotional support at diagnosis may be the reason why some people fail to stay engaged in care. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify how people living with HIV conceptualized emotional support needs and delivery at diagnosis. We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data from 27 people living with HIV, many of whom delayed entry into HIV care. Participants described their experiences seeking care after an HIV diagnosis and identified components of emotional support that aided entry into care - identification, connection, and navigational presence. Many participants stated that these types of support were ideally delivered by peers with HIV. In clinical practice, providers often use an HIV diagnosis as an opportunity to educate patients about HIV prevention and access to services. However, this type of social support may not facilitate engagement in care if emotional support needs are not met.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,594,860
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#428
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,840
of 446,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.