↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Validation of liquid biopsy: plasma cell-free DNA testing in clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 128)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
3 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Validation of liquid biopsy: plasma cell-free DNA testing in clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, January 2018
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s147841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vidya H Veldore, Anuradha Choughule, Tejaswi Routhu, Nitin Mandloi, Vanita Noronha, Amit Joshi, Amit Dutt, Ravi Gupta, Ramprasad Vedam, Kumar Prabhash

Abstract

Plasma cell-free tumor DNA, or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), from liquid biopsy is a potential source of tumor genetic material, in the absence of tissue biopsy, for EGFR testing. Our validation study reiterates the clinical utility of ctDNA next generation sequencing (NGS) for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 163 NSCLC cases were included in the validation, of which 132 patients had paired tissue biopsy and ctDNA. We chose to validate ctDNA using deep sequencing with custom designed bioinformatics methods that could detect somatic mutations at allele frequencies as low as 0.01%. Benchmarking allele specific real time PCR as one of the standard methods for tissue-based EGFR mutation testing, the ctDNA NGS test was validated on all the plasma derived cell-free DNA samples. We observed a high concordance (96.96%) between tissue biopsy and ctDNA for oncogenic driver mutations in Exon 19 and Exon 21 of the EGFR gene. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the assay were 91.1%, 100% 100%, 95.6%, and 97%, respectively. A false negative rate of 3% was observed. A subset of mutations was also verified on droplet digital PCR. Sixteen percent EGFR mutation positivity was observed in patients where only liquid biopsy was available, thus creating options for targeted therapy. This is the first and largest study from India, demonstrating successful validation of circulating cell-free DNA as a clinically useful material for molecular testing in NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,223,604
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#11
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,592
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them