| Title |
The current status of culturally adapted mental health interventions: a practice-focused review of meta-analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s138430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shanaya Rathod, Lina Gega, Amy Degnan, Jennifer Pikard, Tasneem Khan, Nusrat Husain, Tariq Munshi, Farooq Naeem |
| Abstract |
In recent years, there has been a steadily increasing recognition of the need to improve the cultural competence of services and cultural adaptation of interventions so that every individual can benefit from evidence-based care. There have been attempts at culturally adapting evidence-based interventions for mental health problems, and a few meta-analyses have been published in this area. This is, however, a much debated subject. Furthermore, there is a lack of a comprehensive review of meta-analyses and literature reviews that provide guidance to policy makers and clinicians. This review summarizes the current meta-analysis literature on culturally adapted interventions for mental health disorders to provide a succinct account of the current state of knowledge in this area, limitations, and guidance for the future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 70 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 82 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,448,825
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#192
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,713
of 450,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#9
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.