↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Update on treatment options for Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: focus on use of amifampridine

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Update on treatment options for Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome: focus on use of amifampridine
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2011
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s10464
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Lindquist, Martin Stangel

Abstract

In Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), antibodies against presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels reduce the quantal release of acetylcholine, causing muscle weakness and autonomic dysfunction. More than half of the affected patients have associated small cell lung cancer, and thorough screening for an underlying malignancy is crucial. The mainstay of treatment for LEMS is symptomatic but immunotherapy is needed in more severely affected patients. Symptomatic therapies aim at increasing the concentration of acetylcholine at the muscle endplate. While acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were the first drugs to be used for the amelioration of symptoms, 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP, amifampridine) has been shown to be more effective. 3,4-DAP blocks presynaptic potassium channels, thereby prolonging the action potential and increasing presynaptic calcium concentrations. This then results in increased quantal release of acetylcholine. The efficacy of 3,4-DAP for increasing muscle strength and resting compound muscle action potentials has been demonstrated by four placebo-controlled trials. Side effects are usually mild, and the most frequently reported are paresthesias. The most common serious adverse events are epileptic seizures. 3,4-DAP is currently the treatment of choice in patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 26 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#767
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,032
of 121,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.