↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Glaucoma related retinal oximetry: a technology update

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Glaucoma related retinal oximetry: a technology update
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2018
DOI 10.2147/opth.s128459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhu Li Yap, Sushma Verma, Yi Fang Lee, Charles Ong, Aditi Mohla, Shamira A Perera

Abstract

There are two long-standing theories about the pathogenesis of glaucoma - barotrauma and the effect of vascular hypoxia. Currently, it is still unknown whether diminished blood flow is the cause or result of glaucomatous atrophy of ganglion cells and the optic nerve. Though many other imaging techniques used to directly assess ocular blood flow have been well studied, they are limited by their inability to directly assess metabolism in the ocular tissues or measure the oxygen carrying capacity in the vessels. Retinal oximetry is a relatively novel, noninvasive imaging technique that reliably measures oxygen saturation levels in the retinal vessels, offering surrogate markers for the metabolic demands of the eye. The clinical significance of these measurements has not been well established. Thus, this review gives an overview of ocular imaging and current retinal oximetry techniques, while contextualizing the important oximetry studies that have investigated the vascular theory behind glaucoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Neuroscience 8 23%
Engineering 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,088
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,574
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.