↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

In vitro binding and receptor-mediated activity of terlipressin at vasopressin receptors V1 and V2

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of experimental pharmacology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
In vitro binding and receptor-mediated activity of terlipressin at vasopressin receptors V1 and V2
Published in
Journal of experimental pharmacology, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/jep.s146034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khurram Jamil, Stephen Chris Pappas, Krishna R Devarakonda

Abstract

Terlipressin, a synthetic, systemic vasoconstrictor with selective activity at vasopressin-1 (V1) receptors, is a pro-drug for the endogenous/natural porcine hormone [Lys8]-vasopressin (LVP). We investigated binding and receptor-mediated cellular activities of terlipressin, LVP, and endogenous human hormone [Arg8]-vasopressin (AVP) at V1 and vasopressin-2 (V2) receptors. Cell membrane homogenates of Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human V1 and V2 receptors were used in competitive binding assays to measure receptor-binding activity. These cells were used in functional assays to measure receptor-mediated cellular activity of terlipressin, LVP, and AVP. Binding was measured by [3H]AVP counts, and the activity was measured by fluorometric detection of intracellular calcium mobilization (V1) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (V2). Binding potency at V1 and V2 was AVP>LVP>terlipressin. LVP and terlipressin had approximately sixfold higher affinity for V1 than for V2. Cellular activity potency was also AVP>LVP>terlipressin. Terlipressin was a partial agonist at V1 and a full agonist at V2; LVP was a full agonist at both V1 and V2. The in vivo response to terlipressin is likely due to the partial V1 agonist activity of terlipressin and full V1 agonist activity of its metabolite, LVP. These results provide supportive evidence for previous findings and further establish terlipressin pharmacology for vasopressin receptors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Chemistry 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,812,403
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#12
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,794
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them