| Title |
Effect modification, interaction and mediation: an overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s129728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priscila Corraini, Morten Olsen, Lars Pedersen, Olaf M Dekkers, Jan P Vandenbroucke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Colombia | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 53% |
| Scientists | 30 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 457 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 74 | 16% |
| Unknown | 100 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 87 | 19% |
| Unknown | 140 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#736,947
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#33
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,008
of 331,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.