↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression correlates with diminished CD8+ T cell infiltration and predicts poor prognosis in anal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Programmed death-ligand 1 expression correlates with diminished CD8+ T cell infiltration and predicts poor prognosis in anal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s153965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Jie Zhao, Wei-Peng Sun, Jian-Hong Peng, Yu-Xiang Deng, Yu-Jing Fang, Jun Huang, Hui-Zhong Zhang, De-Sen Wan, Jun-Zhong Lin, Zhi-Zhong Pan

Abstract

Increased expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells can be found in various malignancies; however, very limited information is known about its role in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). This study explored PD-L1 expression in ASCC patients and its association with patients' clinicopathological features, CD8+ T cell infiltration, and prognosis. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 26 patients with ASCC were retrieved. The levels of PD-L1 expression on the membrane of both tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. CD8+ T cell densities, both within tumors and at the tumor-stromal interface, were also analyzed. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, human papilloma virus (HPV) status, and outcome data correlated with PD-L1-positive staining. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and TIMCs was observed in 46% and 50% of patients, respectively. Nineteen patients (73%) were HPV positive, with 7 showing PD-L1-positive staining on tumor cells and 9 showing PD-L1-positive staining on TIMCs. Increasing CD8+ density within tumors, but not immune stroma, was significantly associated with decreased PD-L1 expression by both tumor cells and TIMCs (P=0.0043 and P=0.0007). Patients with negative PD-L1 expression had significantly better progression-free survival (P=0.038 and P=0.0443) and a non-statistically significant trend toward longer overall survival (P=0.0882 and P=0.1222) compared with patients with positive PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 is widely expressed on the membrane of tumor cells and TIMCs in ASCCs. Its negative impact on prognosis may be due to the diminished CD8+ T cell infiltration within tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Computer Science 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,581,651
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,056
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,801
of 437,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#28
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.