↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Refractory relapsing polychondritis: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Refractory relapsing polychondritis: challenges and solutions
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , January 2018
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s142892
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Kemta Lekpa, Xavier Chevalier

Abstract

Relapsing polychondritis is a severe systemic immune-mediated disease characterized by an episodic and progressive inflammatory condition with progressive destruction of cartilaginous structures. This disease has for nearly a century kept secrets not yet explained. The real incidence and prevalence of this rare disease are unknown. The multiple clinical presentations and episodic nature of relapsing polychondritis cause a significant diagnosis delay. No guidelines for the management of patients with relapsing polychondritis have been validated to date. The challenges remain, both in the understanding of its pathophysiology and diagnosis, evaluation of its activity and prognosis, and its treatment. Possible solutions involve the sharing of data for relapsing polychondritis from worldwide reference centers. Thus, we would be able to evolve toward a better knowledge of its pathophysiology, the publication of new diagnosis criteria, which will include biological markers and imaging findings, the prediction of life-threatening or organ-threatening situations, and the publication of therapeutic evidence-based guidelines after performing at randomized controlled trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 54%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,229,642
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#104
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,791
of 450,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.