↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Narrative medicine to improve the management and quality of life of patients with COPD: the first experience applying parallel chart in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Narrative medicine to improve the management and quality of life of patients with COPD: the first experience applying parallel chart in Italy
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s148685
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Banfi, Antonietta Cappuccio, Maura E Latella, Luigi Reale, Elisa Muscianisi, Maria Giulia Marini

Abstract

Poor adherence to therapy and the failure of current smoking cessation programs demonstrate that the current management of COPD can be improved, and it is necessary to educate physicians about new approaches for taking care of patients. Parallel chart is a narrative medicine tool that improves the doctor-patient relationship by asking physicians to write about their patients' lives, thereby encouraging reflective thoughts on care. Between October 2015 and March 2016, 50 Italian pulmonologists were involved in the collection of parallel charts of anonymous patients with COPD. The narratives were analyzed according to the Grounded Theory methodology. In the 243 parallel charts collected, the patients (mean age 69 years, 68% men) are described as still active and as a resource for their families (71%). The doctor-patient relationship started as difficult in 50% of cases, and younger age and smoking were the main risk factors. The conversations turned positive in 78% of narratives, displaying deeper mutual knowledge, trust for the clinicians' ability to establish effective therapy (92%), support efforts to quit smoking (63%), or restore patients' activities (78%). All the physicians concurred that the adoption of innovative parallel charts was useful for improving clinical care and worthy of official inclusion in protocols for the management of COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 38 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,625,696
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#447
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,975
of 450,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#19
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.