| Title |
Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for total hip or knee replacement due to primary osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study (the HUNT study and the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s145823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alf Inge Hellevik, Marianne Bakke Johnsen, Arnulf Langhammer, Valborg Baste, Ove Furnes, Kjersti Storheim, John Anker Zwart, Gunnar Birkeland Flugsrud, Lars Nordsletten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 31% |
| Norway | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,386,220
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#147
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,156
of 452,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.