↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

In silico structure-based screening of versatile P-glycoprotein inhibitors using polynomial empirical scoring functions

Overview of attention for article published in Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
In silico structure-based screening of versatile P-glycoprotein inhibitors using polynomial empirical scoring functions
Published in
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/aabc.s56046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergey Shityakov, Carola Förster

Abstract

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an ATP (adenosine triphosphate)-binding cassette transporter that causes multidrug resistance of various chemotherapeutic substances by active efflux from mammalian cells. P-gp plays a pivotal role in limiting drug absorption and distribution in different organs, including the intestines and brain. Thus, the prediction of P-gp-drug interactions is of vital importance in assessing drug pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. To find the strongest P-gp blockers, we performed an in silico structure-based screening of P-gp inhibitor library (1,300 molecules) by the gradient optimization method, using polynomial empirical scoring (POLSCORE) functions. We report a strong correlation (r (2)=0.80, F=16.27, n=6, P<0.0157) of inhibition constants (Kiexp or pKiexp; experimental Ki or negative decimal logarithm of Kiexp) converted from experimental IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) values with POLSCORE-predicted constants (KiPOLSCORE or pKiPOLSCORE), using a linear regression fitting technique. The hydrophobic interactions between P-gp and selected drug substances were detected as the main forces responsible for the inhibition effect. The results showed that this scoring technique might be useful in the virtual screening and filtering of databases of drug-like compounds at the early stage of drug development processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#26
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,119
of 236,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry : AABC
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.