Title |
A top-down technique to improve the solubility and bioavailability of aceclofenac: in vitro and in vivo studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s141504 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reema Narayan, Abhyuday Pednekar, Dipshikha Bhuyan, Chaitra Gowda, KB Koteshwara, Usha Yogendra Nayak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 25 | 34% |
Chemistry | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,571
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,289
of 330,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#50
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.