↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cardiopulmonary exercise test and PaO2 in evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Cardiopulmonary exercise test and PaO2 in evaluation of pulmonary hypertension in COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s150034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingunn Skjørten, Janne Mykland Hilde, Morten Nissen Melsom, Jonny Hisdal, Viggo Hansteen, Kjetil Steine, Sjur Humerfelt

Abstract

Exercise tolerance decreases as COPD progresses. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in COPD and may reduce performance further. COPD patients with and without PH could potentially be identified by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). However, results from previous studies are diverging, and a unified conclusion is missing. We hypothesized that CPET combined with arterial blood gases is useful to discriminate between COPD outpatients with and without PH. In total, 93 COPD patients were prospectively included. Pulmonary function tests, right heart catheterization, and CPET with blood gases were performed. The patients were divided, by mean pulmonary artery pressure, into COPD-noPH (<25 mmHg) and COPD-PH (≥25 mmHg) groups. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were fitted to estimate differences when repeated measurements during the course of exercise were considered and adjusted for gender, age, and airway obstruction. Ventilatory and/or hypoxemic limitation was the dominant cause of exercise termination. In LMM analyses, significant differences between COPD-noPH and COPD-PH were observed for PaO2, SaO2, PaCO2, ventilation, respiratory frequency, and heart rate. PaO2 <61 mmHg (8.1 kPa) during unloaded pedaling, the only load level achieved by all the patients, predicted PH with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 78%. During CPET, low exercise performance and PaO2 strongly indicated PH in COPD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,404
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,359
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#64
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.