↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Role of eosinophils in airway inflammation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
Role of eosinophils in airway inflammation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s152291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald P Tashkin, Michael E Wechsler

Abstract

COPD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In some patients with COPD, eosinophils contribute to inflammation that promotes airway obstruction; approximately a third of stable COPD patients have evidence of eosinophilic inflammation. Although the eosinophil threshold associated with clinical relevance in patients with COPD is currently subject to debate, eosinophil counts hold potential as biomarkers to guide therapy. In particular, eosinophil counts may be useful in assessing which patients may benefit from inhaled corticosteroid therapy, particularly regarding exacerbation prevention. In addition, several therapies targeting eosinophilic inflammation are available or in development, including monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL5 ligand, the IL5 receptor, IL4, and IL13. The goal of this review was to describe the biologic characteristics of eosinophils, their role in COPD during exacerbations and stable disease, and their use as biomarkers to aid treatment decisions. We also propose an algorithm for inhaled corticosteroid use, taking into consideration eosinophil counts and pneumonia history, and emerging eosinophil-targeted therapies in COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 15%
Other 24 11%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 67 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 76 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,844,899
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#134
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,091
of 450,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#7
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.