↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Monotherapy for partial epilepsy: focus on levetiracetam

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Monotherapy for partial epilepsy: focus on levetiracetam
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, March 2008
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s1655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Gambardella, Angelo Labate, Eleonora Colosimo, Roberta Ambrosio, Aldo Quattrone

Abstract

Levetiracetam (LEV), the S-enantiomer of alpha-ethyl-2-oxo-1-pyrollidine acetamide, is a recently licensed antiepileptic drug (AED) for adjunctive therapy of partial seizures. Its mechanism of action is uncertain but it exhibits a unique profile of anticonvulsant activity in models of chronic epilepsy. Five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials enrolling adult or pediatric patients with refractory partial epilepsy have demonstrated the efficacy of LEV as adjunctive therapy, with a responder rate (>/=50% reduction in seizure frequency) of 28%-45%. Long-term efficacy studies suggest retention rates of 60% after one year, with 13% of patients seizure-free for 6 months of the study and 8% seizure-free for 1 year. More recent studies illustrated successful conversion to monotherapy in patients with refractory epilepsy, and its effectiveness as a single agent in partial epilepsy. LEV has also efficacy in generalized epilepsies. Adverse effects of LEV, including somnolence, lethargy, and dizziness, are generally mild and their occurrence rate seems to be not significantly different from that observed in placebo groups. LEV also has no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with other AEDs, or with commonly prescribed medications. The combination of effective antiepileptic properties with a relatively mild adverse effect profile makes LEV an attractive therapy for partial seizures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Psychology 4 8%
Chemistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,151
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,886
of 95,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.