↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Advances in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: focus on eribulin

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Advances in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: focus on eribulin
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s143019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Koliou, Vasilios Karavasilis, Maria Theochari, Seth M Pollack, Robin L Jones, Khin Thway

Abstract

Eribulin mesylate is a synthetic derivative of halichondrin B isolated from a marine sponge. Its mechanism of action is through microtubule inhibition, which is different from that of taxanes. Eribulin has been approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and more recently for non-operable or metastatic liposarcoma in patients who have received prior anthracycline chemotherapy. The major side effects of eribulin are bone marrow suppression including neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, and fatigue/weakness, which can be well managed. In this article, we reviewed evidence from the latest published data on eribulin and its use in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. We explored the drug's mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism. Lastly, we reviewed all preclinical studies as well as clinical trials that investigated eribulin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#237
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,297
of 450,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.