↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Postoperative pain management in the postanesthesia care unit: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Postoperative pain management in the postanesthesia care unit: an update
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s142889
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Luo, Su Min

Abstract

Acute postoperative pain remains a major problem, resulting in multiple undesirable outcomes if inadequately controlled. Most surgical patients spend their immediate postoperative period in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), where pain management, being unsatisfactory and requiring improvements, affects further recovery. Recent studies on postoperative pain management in the PACU were reviewed for the advances in assessments and treatments. More objective assessments of pain being independent of patients' participation may be potentially appropriate in the PACU, including photoplethysmography-derived parameters, analgesia nociception index, skin conductance, and pupillometry, although further studies are needed to confirm their utilities. Multimodal analgesia with different analgesics and techniques has been widely used. With theoretical basis of preventing central sensitization, preventive analgesia is increasingly common. New opioids are being developed with minimization of adverse effects of traditional opioids. More intravenous nonopioid analgesics and adjuncts (such as dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone) are introduced for their opioid-sparing effects. Current evidence suggests that regional analgesic techniques are effective in the reduction of pain and stay in the PACU. Being available alternatives to epidural analgesia, perineural techniques and infiltrative techniques including wound infiltration, transversus abdominis plane block, local infiltration analgesia, and intraperitoneal administration have played a more important role for their effectiveness and safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 327 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 34 10%
Other 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 117 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 128 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,490,822
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,162
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,077
of 329,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#41
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.