↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A novel paradigm to evaluate conditioned pain modulation in fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
A novel paradigm to evaluate conditioned pain modulation in fibromyalgia
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s115193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia J Schoen, Jacob N Ablin, Eric Ichesco, Rupal J Bhavsar, Laura Kochlefl, Richard E Harris, Daniel J Clauw, Richard H Gracely, Steven E Harte

Abstract

Application of noxious stimulation to one body area reduces pain sensitivity in a remote body area through activation of an endogenous pain-inhibitory network, a behavioral phenomenon referred to as conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The efficiency of CPM is predictive of a variety of health outcomes, while impaired CPM has been associated with various chronic pain conditions. Current methods used to assess CPM vary widely, and interest in CPM method development remains strong. Here, we evaluated a novel method for assessing CPM in healthy controls and fibromyalgia (FM) patients using thumb pressure as both a test and conditioning stimulus. Sixteen female FM patients and 14 matched healthy controls underwent CPM testing with thumbnail pressure as the test stimulus, and either cold water or noxious pressure as the conditioning stimulus. CPM magnitude was evaluated as the difference in pain rating of the test stimulus applied before and during the conditioning stimulus. In healthy controls, application of either pressure or cold water conditioning stimulation induced CPM as evidenced by a significant reduction in test stimulus pain rating during conditioning (P=0.007 and P=0.021, respectively). In contrast, in FM patients, neither conditioning stimulus induced a significant CPM effect (P>0.274). There was a significant difference in CPM magnitude for FM patients compared to healthy controls with noxious pressure conditioning stimulation (P=0.023); however, no significant difference in CPM was found between groups using cold water as a conditioning stimulus (P=0.269). The current study demonstrates that thumbnail pressure can be used as both a test and conditioning stimulus in the assessment of CPM. This study further confirms previous findings of attenuated CPM in FM patients compared with healthy controls.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Neuroscience 13 14%
Psychology 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,462,806
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,604
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,112
of 338,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#31
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.