Title |
Physicians’ experience adopting the electronic transfer of care communication tool: barriers and opportunities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s72953 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chloe de Grood, Katherine Eso, Maria Jose Santana |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
Psychology | 6 | 10% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,753,012
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#193
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,061
of 354,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.