↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Psychiatric and physical comorbidities and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Psychiatric and physical comorbidities and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s146717
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rogier Scherder, Neeltje Kant, Evelien T Wolf, Bas Pijnenburg, Erik JA Scherder

Abstract

It has been observed that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), who have psychiatric and physical comorbidities such as depression and COPD, have an increased risk of experiencing more pain. In this study, we have distinguished between pain intensity and pain affect, as the latter, particularly, requires treatment. Furthermore, while pain and comorbidities have been assessed using questionnaires, this is possibly a less reliable method for those who are cognitively vulnerable. The aim of this study was to determine whether psychiatric and physical comorbidities can predict pain intensity and pain affect in MS patients, susceptible to cognitive impairment. Ninety-four patients with MS and 80 control participants participated in this cross-sectional study. Besides depression and anxiety, 47 additional comorbidities were extracted from patients' medical records. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory and the Symptom Check List-90. Pain was assessed using the Number of Words Chosen Affective, Coloured Analog Scale, and the Faces Pain Scale. Cognitive functions, for example, memory and executive functions, were assessed using several neuropsychological tests. The main findings indicate that psychiatric comorbidities (depression and anxiety) predict both pain intensity and pain affect and that total physical comorbidity predicts only pain affect in MS patients, susceptible to cognitive impairment. Both psychiatric and physical comorbidities predict pain affect. All three clinical outcomes enhance MS patients' suffering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Neuroscience 9 16%
Psychology 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,376,243
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,023
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,295
of 440,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.