| Title |
Nanoemulsion as a strategy for improving the oral bioavailability and anti-inflammatory activity of andrographolide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s154824 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching-Chi Yen, Yi-Chen Chen, Ming-Tsang Wu, Chia-Chi Wang, Yu-Tse Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,122
of 4,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,978
of 453,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#20
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.