↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

ISL1 is upregulated in breast cancer and promotes cell proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
ISL1 is upregulated in breast cancer and promotes cell proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/ott.s144241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Li, Fuwen Sun, Xiaoyan Chen, Minghui Zhang

Abstract

ISL1 plays a key role in several cancers, including pheochromocytoma, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, and lung tumors and bile duct carcinoma. In order to elucidate the role of ISL1 in breast cancer, we performed quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting analysis, and we found that ISL1 was upregulated in breast cancer cells and tissues. Moreover, high expression of ISL1 was correlated with tumor size, metastasis, and poor prognosis. Colony formation analysis and CCK-8 analysis revealed that ISL1 facilitated breast cancer cell proliferation. In addition, wound healing analysis and transwell invasion analysis demonstrated that ISL1 played a role in cell migration and invasion. Interestingly, the expression of ISL1 was also associated with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in breast cancer, and ISL1 promoted angiogenesis in breast cancer. In conclusion, reducing the expression of ISL1 suppresses proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis in breast cancer, suggesting that ISL1 might serve as a novel molecular therapy target in breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Engineering 3 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#887
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,329
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#18
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.