↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Tannic acid-modified silver nanoparticles for wound healing: the importance of size

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Tannic acid-modified silver nanoparticles for wound healing: the importance of size
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s154797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piotr Orlowski, Magdalena Zmigrodzka, Emilia Tomaszewska, Katarzyna Ranoszek-Soliwoda, Monika Czupryn, Malgorzata Antos-Bielska, Janusz Szemraj, Grzegorz Celichowski, Jaroslaw Grobelny, Malgorzata Krzyzowska

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been shown to promote wound healing and to exhibit antimicrobial properties against a broad range of bacteria. In our previous study, we prepared tannic acid (TA)-modified AgNPs showing a good toxicological profile and immunomodulatory properties useful for potential dermal applications. In this study, in vitro scratch assay, antimicrobial tests, modified lymph node assay as well as a mouse splint wound model were used to access the wound healing potential of TA-modified and unmodified AgNPs. TA-modified but not unmodified AgNPs exhibited effective antibacterial activity againstPseudomonas aeruginosa,Staphylococcus aureusandEscherichia coliand stimulated migration of keratinocytes in vitro. The tests using the mouse splint wound model showed that TA-modified 33 and 46 nm AgNPs promoted better wound closure, epithelialization, angiogenesis and formation of the granulation tissue. Additionally, AgNPs elicited expression of VEGF-α, PDGF-β and TGF-β1 cytokines involved in wound healing more efficiently in comparison to control and TA-treated wounds. However, both the lymph node assay and the wound model showed that TA-modified AgNPs sized 13 nm can elicit strong inflammatory response not only during wound healing but also when applied to the damaged skin. TA-modified AgNPs sized >26 nm promote wound healing better than TA-modified or unmodified AgNPs. These findings suggest that TA-modified AgNPs sized >26 nm may have a promising application in wound management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 87 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 28 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Materials Science 14 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 98 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,965
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,242
of 450,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#50
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.