↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drug–drug interactions involving antidepressants: focus on desvenlafaxine

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Drug–drug interactions involving antidepressants: focus on desvenlafaxine
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s157708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvette Low, Sajita Setia, Graca Lima

Abstract

Psychiatric and physical conditions often coexist, and there is robust evidence that associates the frequency of depression with single and multiple physical conditions. More than half of patients with depression may have at least one chronic physical condition. Therefore, antidepressants are often used in cotherapy with other medications for the management of both psychiatric and chronic physical illnesses. The risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is augmented by complex polypharmacy regimens and extended periods of treatment required, of which possible outcomes range from tolerability issues to lack of efficacy and serious adverse events. Optimal patient outcomes may be achieved through drug selection with minimal potential for DDIs. Desvenlafaxine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder. Pharmacokinetic studies of desvenlafaxine have shown a simple metabolic profile unique among antidepressants. This review examines the DDI profiles of antidepressants, particularly desvenlafaxine, in relation to drugs of different therapeutic areas. The summary and comparison of information available is meant to help clinicians in making informed decisions when using desvenlafaxine in patients with depression and comorbid chronic conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 43 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 49 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,080
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,006
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#24
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.