↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Genome-editing applications of CRISPR–Cas9 to promote in vitro studies of Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Genome-editing applications of CRISPR–Cas9 to promote in vitro studies of Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/cia.s155145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vo Van Giau, Hyon Lee, Kyu Hwan Shim, Eva Bagyinszky, Seong Soo A An

Abstract

Genetic variations play an important role in the clinical presentation and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD), especially early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Hundreds of mutations have been reported with the majority resulting from alterations in β-amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PSEN1), or presenilin 2 (PSEN2) genes. The roles of these mutations in the pathogenesis of AD have been classically confirmed or refuted through functional studies, where the mutations are cloned, inserted into cell lines, and monitored for changes in various properties including cell survival, amyloid production, or Aβ42/40 ratio. However, these verification studies tend to be expensive, time consuming, and inconsistent. Recently, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) system was developed, which improves sequence-specific gene editing in cell lines, organs, and animals. CRISPR-Cas9 is a promising tool for the generation of models of human genetic diseases and could facilitate the establishment of new animal AD models and the observation of dynamic bioprocesses in AD. Here, we recapitulated the history of CRISPR technology, recent progress, and, especially, its potential applications in AD-related genetic, animal modeling, and functional studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 23%
Student > Master 17 11%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 56 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 29%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 58 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,779
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389,408
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#41
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.