↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Autoimmune destruction of pericytes as the cause of diabetic retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Autoimmune destruction of pericytes as the cause of diabetic retinopathy
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2008
DOI 10.2147/opth.s2629
Authors

Duncan Adams

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2009.
All research outputs
#896,791
of 3,928,191 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#69
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,071
of 120,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,928,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.