↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Women’s experience of acute skin toxicity following radiation therapy in breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Women’s experience of acute skin toxicity following radiation therapy in breast cancer
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s155538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eivind Richter Andersen, Grethe Eilertsen, Aud Mette Myklebust, Siren Eriksen

Abstract

Acute skin toxicity is experienced by 70%-100% of patients receiving radiation therapy following breast cancer. Most studies focus on skin appearances and treatment of such reactions, not the experience. Increased knowledge about patients' experience will contribute to provide tailored patient care. Thus, the purpose was to investigate patients' experiences of acute skin toxicity following radiation therapy for breast cancer. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with seven women, 2-3 weeks post-treatment. Five broad areas of inquiry were investigated: 1) experiences from the development of skin reactions; 2) experiences in day-to-day life; 3) coping strategies; 4) experiences of information; and 5) experiences from the aftercare. The interviews were analyzed in line with qualitative content analysis. The main theme "Not so bad itself, but it comes on top of everything else" was identified, based upon three categories: 1) unique experience of the skin; 2) it is something about the psychological aspect; and 3) experience of information. Acute skin toxicity following breast cancer treatment may affect many dimensions of patients' lives. Experiences are complex, individual, and not necessarily consistent with visible changes of the skin. A holistic approach is necessary to provide treatment and support according to patients' individual needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Unspecified 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,040,874
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#68
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,221
of 450,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.