↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Dupilumab: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Core Evidence, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Dupilumab: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of atopic dermatitis
Published in
Core Evidence, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/ce.s133661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panteha Eshtiaghi, Melinda J Gooderham

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a recurrent, pruritic inflammatory skin disease with complex immunopathogenesis characterized by a dominant TH2 response. Dupilumab is an interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha antagonist that subsequently blocks IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. It has recently been approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD whose current treatment options are limited. This article reviews the evidence of clinical efficacy, safety, and patient-reported out-come (PRO) measures from Phase I-III trials of dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Results from clinical trials of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD have shown that weekly or biweekly dupilumab injections significantly improve clinical and PROs. Transcriptome and serum analyses also found that dupilumab significantly modulates the AD molecular signature and other TH2-associated biomarkers, compared with placebo. Additionally, concomitant use of dupilumab with topical corticosteroids (TCS) results in a greater improvement in signs and symptoms of AD than with dupilumab use alone. Throughout the trials, common adverse events were headaches, conjunctivitis, and injection site reactions. These were consistently mild-moderate and occurred with similar frequency between the treatment and placebo groups. In adult patients with moderate-to-severe refractory AD, monotherapy or concomitant use of dupilumab with TCS holds great promise to significantly improve clinical outcomes and quality of life of the patient. Ongoing studies of dupilumab will help determine the clinical efficacy and safety profile of its long-term use. Finally, further economic evidence is warranted to compare the long-term costs and benefits of dupilumab with other currently available treatments for moderate-to-severe AD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 25 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#63
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,656
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them