↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Sex differences in gut microbiota in patients with major depressive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Sex differences in gut microbiota in patients with major depressive disorder
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s159322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian-jun Chen, Peng Zheng, Yi-yun Liu, Xiao-gang Zhong, Hai-yang Wang, Yu-jie Guo, Peng Xie

Abstract

Our previous studies found that disturbances in gut microbiota might have a causative role in the onset of major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were sex differences in gut microbiota in patients with MDD. First-episode drug-naïve MDD patients and healthy controls were included. 16S rRNA gene sequences extracted from the fecal samples of the included subjects were analyzed. Principal-coordinate analysis and partial least squares-discriminant analysis were used to assess whether there were sex-specific gut microbiota. A random forest algorithm was used to identify the differential operational taxonomic units. Linear discriminant-analysis effect size was further used to identify the dominant sex-specific phylotypes responsible for the differences between MDD patients and healthy controls. In total, 57 and 74 differential operational taxonomic units responsible for separating female and male MDD patients from their healthy counterparts were identified. Compared with their healthy counterparts, increased Actinobacteria and decreased Bacteroidetes levels were found in female and male MDD patients, respectively. The most differentially abundant bacterial taxa in female and male MDD patients belonged to phyla Actinobacteria and Bacteroidia, respectively. Meanwhile, female and male MDD patients had different dominant phylotypes. These results demonstrated that there were sex differences in gut microbiota in patients with MDD. The suitability of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidia as the sex-specific biomarkers for diagnosing MDD should be further explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 77 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 9%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Psychology 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 86 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,840,023
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#377
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,431
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#16
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.