↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
Title
Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, January 2018
DOI 10.2147/clep.s146397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie L Bell, Amy L Whitehead, Steven A Julious

Abstract

A pilot study can be an important step in the assessment of an intervention by providing information to design the future definitive trial. Pilot studies can be used to estimate the recruitment and retention rates and population variance and to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy potential. However, estimation is poor because pilot studies are small, so sensitivity analyses for the main trial's sample size calculations should be undertaken. We demonstrate how to carry out easy-to-perform sensitivity analysis for designing trials based on pilot data using an example. Furthermore, we introduce rules of thumb for the size of the pilot study so that the overall sample size, for both pilot and main trials, is minimized. The example illustrates how sample size estimates for the main trial can alter dramatically by plausibly varying assumptions. Required sample size for 90% power varied from 392 to 692 depending on assumptions. Some scenarios were not feasible based on the pilot study recruitment and retention rates. Pilot studies can be used to help design the main trial, but caution should be exercised. We recommend the use of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the design assumptions for a main trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 410 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 13%
Researcher 50 12%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 81 20%
Unknown 120 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 13%
Psychology 44 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 23 6%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Other 83 20%
Unknown 143 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,753,003
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#388
of 734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,779
of 443,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.