↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Triple-negative breast cancer: new perspectives for targeted therapies

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Triple-negative breast cancer: new perspectives for targeted therapies
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s67673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federica Tomao, Anselmo Papa, Eleonora Zaccarelli, Luigi Rossi, Davide Caruso, Marina Minozzi, Patrizia Vici, Luigi Frati, Silverio Tomao

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, encompassing a large number of entities showing different morphological features and having clinical behaviors. It has became apparent that this diversity may be justified by distinct patterns of genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic aberrations. The identification of gene-expression microarray-based characteristics has led to the identification of at least five breast cancer subgroups: luminal A, luminal B, normal breast-like, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and basal-like. Triple-negative breast cancer is a complex disease diagnosed by immunohistochemistry, and it is characterized by malignant cells not expressing estrogen receptors or progesterone receptors at all, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Along with this knowledge, recent data show that triple-negative breast cancer has specific molecular features that could be possible targets for new biological targeted drugs. The aim of this article is to explore the use of new drugs in this particular setting, which is still associated with poor prognosis and high risk of distant recurrence and death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 18%
Chemistry 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,917,923
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#344
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,062
of 360,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.