↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s156724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hua-feng Zhang, Chen-guang Wang, Hui Li, Yu-ting Huang, Zhi-jun Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 42 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 46 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,476,625
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#420
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,956
of 345,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.