↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Psychosocial aspects of rosacea with a focus on anxiety and depression

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial aspects of rosacea with a focus on anxiety and depression
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s126850
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Heisig, Adam Reich

Abstract

Rosacea is a common, chronic skin condition characterized by facial redness and inflammatory lesions. The disease can lead to social stigmatization and may significantly reduce the quality of life of patients. Psychosocial impact of rosacea can be severe and debilitating; however, it is still underestimated. This paper provides a literature review focused on depression and anxiety in patients with rosacea. Rosacea patients have an increased risk of developing depression and anxiety and tend to avoid social situations. However, there are still limited data on this condition. Effective treatment of clinical symptoms brings significant improvement in psychological symptoms. Further studies should be conducted to investigate in more detail the psychological impact of rosacea. In addition, improvement of the efficacy of rosacea treatment is still needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 21%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#579,297
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#62
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,364
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.