↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Posaconazole achieves prompt recovery of voriconazole-induced liver injury in a case of invasive aspergillosis

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Posaconazole achieves prompt recovery of voriconazole-induced liver injury in a case of invasive aspergillosis
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/idr.s154457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Martínez-Casanova, Nuria Carballo, Sonia Luque, Luisa Sorli, Santiago Grau

Abstract

Azole antifungals have frequently been linked to the presence of hepatotoxicity, but there is scarce information on cross-toxicity between these drugs or on the possibility of using some of them when this type of toxicity occurs. We report the case of a 64-year-old man with invasive aspergillosis (IA) leading to spondylodiscitis with neurological involvement. Early management included intravenous (iv) voriconazole, which had to be interrupted after 1 week due to liver damage. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of voriconazole showed that the plasma concentration was within the therapeutic range. However, it was replaced by a combination therapy of oral posaconazole plus iv caspofungin. Posaconazole allowed normalization of liver enzymes. After finishing posaconazole monotherapy on an outpatient basis, the patient made a full recovery. This case report provides further evidence that oral posaconazole is safe and effective as rescue therapy after the appearance of voriconazole-induced liver toxicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,969,772
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#624
of 1,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,501
of 331,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.