↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Anxiety and depression in patients with end-stage renal disease: impact and management challenges – a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 241)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
Title
Anxiety and depression in patients with end-stage renal disease: impact and management challenges – a narrative review
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s126615
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhong Sheng Goh, Konstadina Griva

Abstract

Psychiatric disorders commonly co-exist with the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Research on depression and CKD has increased to a great extent. Multiple studies have demonstrated that depression is more prevalent in CKD and that end-stage renal disease is a robust risk factor for adverse outcomes such as hospitalization and mortality, yet these are often underdiagnosed or untreated. This review provides a selective overview on the prevalence rates of depression and anxiety in patients with CKD and across renal replacement therapies, the factors most consistently associated with symptoms of distress and their clinical implications. Finally, treatment and management strategies from relevant literature are appraised and discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 360 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Researcher 19 5%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 152 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 75 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 18%
Psychology 23 6%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Unspecified 5 1%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 162 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,336,853
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#17
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,344
of 345,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.