↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Changes in ventilation–perfusion during and after an COPD exacerbation: an assessment using fluid dynamic modeling

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Changes in ventilation–perfusion during and after an COPD exacerbation: an assessment using fluid dynamic modeling
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s153295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bita Hajian, Jan De Backer, Wim Vos, Wouter H van Geffen, Paul De Winter, Omar Usmani, Tony Cahn, Huib AM Kerstjens, Massimo Pistolesi, Wilfried De Backer

Abstract

Severe exacerbations associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that require hospitalization significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. Definitions for exacerbations are very broad, and it is unclear whether there is one predominant underlying mechanism that leads to them. Functional respiratory imaging (FRI) with modeling provides detailed information about airway resistance, hyperinflation, and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch during and following an acute exacerbation. Forty-two patients with COPD participating in a multicenter study were assessed by FRI, pulmonary function tests, and self-reported outcome measures during an acute exacerbation and following resolution. Arterial blood gasses and lung function parameters were measured. A significant correlation was found between alveolar-arterial gradient and image-based V/Q (iV/Q), suggesting that iV/Q represents V/Q mismatch during an exacerbation (p<0.05). Recovery of an exacerbation is due to decreased (mainly distal) airway resistance (p<0.05). Improvement in patient-reported outcomes were also associated with decreased distal airway resistance (p<0.05), but not with forced expiratory volume. FRI is, therefore, a sensitive tool to describe changes in airway caliber, ventilation, and perfusion during and after exacerbation. On the basis of the fact that FRI increased distal airway resistance seems to be the main cause of an exacerbation, therapy should mainly focus on decreasing it during and after the acute event.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Other 8 13%
Professor 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,123,458
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#496
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,669
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#23
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.