↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
530 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s67124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan Allyse, Mollie A Minear, Elisa Berson, Shilpa Sridhar, Margaret Rote, Anthony Hung, Subhashini Chandrasekharan

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) is an advance in the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies that analyzes cell-free fetal DNA in the blood of a pregnant woman. Since its introduction to clinical practice in Hong Kong in 2011, NIPT has quickly spread across the globe. While many professional societies currently recommend that NIPT be used as a screening method, not a diagnostic test, its high sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) make it an attractive alternative to the serum screens and invasive tests currently in use. Professional societies also recommend that NIPT be accompanied by genetic counseling so that families can make informed reproductive choices. If NIPT becomes more widely adopted, States will have to implement regulation and oversight to ensure it fits into existing legal frameworks, with particular attention to returning fetal sex information in areas where sex-based abortions are prevalent. Although there are additional challenges for NIPT uptake in the developing world, including the lack of health care professionals and infrastructure, the use of NIPT in low-resource settings could potentially reduce the need for skilled clinicians who perform invasive testing. Future advances in NIPT technology promise to expand the range of conditions that can be detected, including single gene disorders. With these advances come questions of how to handle incidental findings and variants of unknown significance. Moving forward, it is essential that all stakeholders have a voice in crafting policies to ensure the ethical and equitable use of NIPT across the world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 524 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 83 16%
Student > Master 75 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 9%
Researcher 47 9%
Other 41 8%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 160 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 89 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 5%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Other 46 9%
Unknown 175 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,720,761
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#104
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,594
of 361,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.