↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

CTLA-4 blockade: therapeutic potential in cancer treatments

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
CTLA-4 blockade: therapeutic potential in cancer treatments
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, March 2010
DOI 10.2147/ott.s4833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad A Tarhini, Fatima Iqbal

Abstract

Enhancing or prolonging T-cell activation by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking negative signaling receptors such as CTLA4 is one approach to overcoming tumor-induced immune tolerance. Ipilimumab and tremelimumab inhibit CTLA4, prolonging antitumor immune responses and leading to durable anti-tumor effects. Treatment with these mAbs has demonstrated clinically important and durable tumor responses and disease control rates in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma. Durable objective responses have been reported across a spectrum of doses and schedules, with relative safety in this patient population. Although the phase III tremelimumab melanoma study was closed for "futility", the 1-year survival rate of >50% for tremelimumab and the median survival of 11.7 months (compared with 10.7 months for chemotherapy) are notable. Results of the phase III studies testing CTLA4-blockade with ipilimumab are eagerly anticipated. The further development of these agents includes testing in the neoadjuvant melanoma setting (ipilimumab) as well the adjuvant high-risk melanoma setting (ipilimumab). Future progress with CTLA-4 blockade therapy will also likely come from the use of combinations of agents that target several critical regulatory pathways of the immune system and modulate the immune response in the host in a synergistic and controlled fashion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,838,613
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#148
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,890
of 103,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them