↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 2,085)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
797 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1007 Mendeley
Title
Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s149619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Sitarz, Małgorzata Skierucha, Jerzy Mielko, G Johan A Offerhaus, Ryszard Maciejewski, Wojciech P Polkowski

Abstract

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world, the epidemiology of which has changed within last decades. A trend of steady decline in gastric cancer incidence rates is the effect of the increased standards of hygiene, conscious nutrition, andHelicobacter pylorieradication, which together constitute primary prevention. Avoidance of gastric cancer remains a priority. However, patients with higher risk should be screened for early detection and chemoprevention. Surgical resection enhanced by standardized lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard in gastric cancer therapy. This review briefly summarizes the most important aspects of gastric cancers, which include epidemiology, risk factors, classification, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. The paper is mostly addressed to physicians who are interested in updating the state of art concerning gastric carcinoma from easily accessible and credible source.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,007 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1007 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 166 16%
Student > Master 113 11%
Researcher 77 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 7%
Student > Postgraduate 53 5%
Other 137 14%
Unknown 391 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 266 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 128 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 3%
Other 93 9%
Unknown 422 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#589,517
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#13
of 2,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,788
of 451,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.