| Title |
Elderly care recipients’ perceptions of treatment helpfulness for depression and the relationship with help-seeking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s70086 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna Atkins, Sharon L Naismith, Georgina M Luscombe, Ian B Hickie |
| Abstract |
This study aims to examine perceptions of the helpfulness of treatments/interventions for depression held by elderly care recipients, to examine whether these beliefs are related to help-seeking and whether the experience of depression affects beliefs about treatment seeking, and to identify the characteristics of help-seekers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,779
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,533
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#43
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.