↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The effect of visual biofeedback on balance in elderly population: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
The effect of visual biofeedback on balance in elderly population: a systematic review
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s127023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hammad Alhasan, Victoria Hood, Frederick Mainwaring

Abstract

Balance is commonly affected by multiple factors, especially among the elderly population. Visual biofeedback (VBF) is an intervention tool that can be used in balance rehabilitation. This study aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials that examine whether VBF training is effective in improving balance in an elderly population. Three databases were searched: CIAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. The searches were limited to the period from 2010 to 2016. Healthy adults, aged ≥65 years, with no specific disorders were included. Interventions were any VBF intervention with the aim of improving balance and were compared to no intervention, traditional exercises, placebo, or standard care. The outcome measures were balance as measured by any validated outcome measure. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality assessment tool and The Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias were used by two independent authors (HA and FM) in order to appraise the included studies. The database search resulted in 879 articles, of which five papers were included. VBF was compared to no intervention, a placebo, and traditional exercise. The total number of participants in all the five included studies was 181, with a mean age of 74.3 years (standard deviation 6.7). Two studies were rated as high-quality studies, and three were rated as fair quality. Engaging elderly people living in the community in VBF training was found to be effective and could improve their balance ability. However, the variation between studies in methodology, intervention protocol, and outcomes utilized made it difficult to inform a definitive statement regarding the potential application of VBF for balance training with the elderly. Furthermore, high-quality randomized control trials are required. The systematic review level of evidence is moderate, and the strength of recommendation is that VBF is likely to be beneficial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 189 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Sports and Recreations 15 8%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Engineering 12 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 60 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#704
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,140
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.