↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patients with heart failure and their partners with chronic illness: interdependence in multiple dimensions of time

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Patients with heart failure and their partners with chronic illness: interdependence in multiple dimensions of time
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s146938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Nimmon, Joanna Bates, Gil Kimel, Lorelei Lingard

Abstract

Informal caregivers play a vital role in supporting patients with heart failure (HF). However, when both the HF patient and their long-term partner suffer from chronic illness, they may equally suffer from diminished quality of life and poor health outcomes. With the focus on this specific couple group as a dimension of the HF health care team, we explored this neglected component of supportive care. From a large-scale Canadian multisite study, we analyzed the interview data of 13 HF patient-partner couples (26 participants). The sample consisted of patients with advanced HF and their long-term, live-in partners who also suffer from chronic illness. The analysis highlighted the profound enmeshment of the couples. The couples' interdependence was exemplified in the ways they synchronized their experience in shared dimensions of time and adapted their day-to-day routines to accommodate each other's changing health status. Particularly significant was when both individuals were too ill to perform caregiving tasks, which resulted in the couples being in a highly fragile state. We conclude that the salience of this couple group's oscillating health needs and their severe vulnerabilities need to be appreciated when designing and delivering HF team-based care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 28%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,000,263
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#260
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,729
of 345,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.