↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Primary clear cell carcinoma of the thymus and literature comparison of features

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Primary clear cell carcinoma of the thymus and literature comparison of features
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s158452
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaomin Dai, Li Zhao, Fang Peng

Abstract

Clear cell carcinoma arising from the thymus is considered exceedingly rare. It shows aggressive clinical behavior and demonstrates frequent local recurrences as well as widespread metastasis. The detailed clinical data of one patient with thymic clear cell carcinoma were compiled, and a review of relevant reported studies was performed. We summarized the clinical characteristics, pathological diagnosis of the patient and other reported cases. The analysis showed that older male patients were more likely to suffer, and the manifestations included chest pain and dyspnea. Some patients are asymptomatic, with the tumor being discovered during physical examination. Histologically, thymic clear cell carcinoma is composed of lobulated structures arranged in hyperchromatic fibrous stroma; the tumor cells are uniform with obvious nucleoli and clear cytoplasm. To establish the correct diagnosis, consideration and exclusion of metastasis and other original tumors in the differential diagnosis by immunohistochemistry, clinical and radiologic correlation is important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Psychology 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#792
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,031
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.