Title |
Cost effectiveness of endometrial ablation with the NovaSure® system versus other global ablation modalities and hysterectomy for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding: US commercial and Medicaid payer perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s75030 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeffrey D Miller, Gregory M Lenhart, Machaon M Bonafede, Cindy M Basinski, Andrea S Lukes, Kathleen A Troeger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 23% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#313
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,446
of 354,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.